Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Man Floats at 11,000 Feet With Balloons and Lawn Chair

Photo © Pete Erikson/The Bulletin

Kent Couch sailed with his 105 balloons (4 feet in diameter each) early Saturday morning. He was climbing at roughly 800 feet per minute to a cruising altitude that averaged 11,000 feet. He traveled 193 miles in eight hours and 45 minutes. The trip cost about $5,000. Helium alone cost $2,400 for 49 tanks.

And this is the second time he's tried such a stunt! He reached 15,000 feet during his first trip.

Mr. Couch was inspired to try this flight after watching the “MythBusters” episode about the infamous Larry Walters balloon and lawnchair flight - which ended up interrupting air traffic to LAX for several hours. Since "Mythbusters" proved it could be done, Mr. Couch figured, "why not me?"

It's a cool story, if you want to read it.


The Prophet Jeremiah

This fragment is a receipt for payment made by a figure in the Old Testament.

© Ian Jones/London Telegraph


Michael Jursa made what has been called the most important find in Biblical archaeology for 100 years - a discovery that supports the view that the historical books of the Old Testament are based on fact.
Searching for Babylonian financial accounts among the tablets, Prof Jursa suddenly came across a name he half remembered - Nabu-sharrussu-ukin, described there in a hand 2,500 years old, as "the chief eunuch" of Nebuchadnezzar II, king of Babylon.

Prof Jursa, an Assyriologist, checked the Old Testament and there in chapter 39 of the Book of Jeremiah, he found, spelled differently, the same name - Nebo-Sarsekim.

Nebo-Sarsekim, according to Jeremiah, was Nebuchadnezzar II's "chief officer" and was with him at the siege of Jerusalem in 587 BC, when the Babylonians overran the city.

The small tablet, the size of "a packet of 10 cigarettes" according to Irving Finkel, a British Museum expert, is a bill of receipt acknowledging Nabu-sharrussu-ukin's payment of 0.75 kg of gold to a temple in Babylon.

The tablet is dated to the 10th year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, 595BC, 12 years before the siege of Jerusalem.

[...]

"This is a fantastic discovery, a world-class find," Dr Finkel said yesterday. "If Nebo-Sarsekim existed, which other lesser figures in the Old Testament existed? A throwaway detail in the Old Testament turns out to be accurate and true. I think that it means that the whole of the narrative [of Jeremiah] takes on a new kind of power."

Cuneiform is the oldest known form of writing and was commonly used in the Middle East between 3,200 BC and the second century AD. It was created by pressing a wedge-shaped instrument, usually a cut reed, into moist clay.

The full translation of the tablet reads: (Regarding) 1.5 minas (0.75 kg) of gold, the property of Nabu-sharrussu-ukin, the chief eunuch, which he sent via Arad-Banitu the eunuch to [the temple] Esangila: Arad-Banitu has delivered [it] to Esangila. In the presence of Bel-usat, son of Alpaya, the royal bodyguard, [and of] Nadin, son of Marduk-zer-ibni. Month XI, day 18, year 10 [of] Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Haloscan

Is it just me, or is Haloscan becoming a giant, never-will-work-when-you-use-it pain in the backside?

Silly Humor

If you like taking silly internet quizzes (as I do), you may be interested in this one.

I am smarter than 99.76% of the rest of the world.
Find out how smart you are.

From GOA

Highlights from the Gun Owners of American Alert
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Click here for full text


"For the first time [in history, HR 2640], if enacted, would statutorily impose a lifetime gun ban on battle-scarred veterans." -- Military Order of the Purple Heart, June 18, 2007

ACTION:

Even if you have already sent an e-mail to your Senators on the McCarthy bill, please send another such as the one at the end of this alert. Yes, you might have already taken action on HR 2640. But if you (and many other gun owners like yourself) haven't taken any action recently, then NO ONE is taking action. After all, the NRA is supporting this bill, so they're not rustlin' up the troops in opposition to this massive gun control bill. Remember the immigration fight -- it took weeks of continued activism to kill that bill. This fight may very well be the same.

Please try to get as many of your friends as you can to join with you in this effort to kill the McCarthy bill (HR 2640). Now that Senators are returning from their July 4th holiday, we need to get as many gun owners as possible to remind them that HR 2640 is unacceptable!

[...]

You will remember that before the Independence Day break, the House of Representatives passed a McCarthy gun control bill (HR 2640) without any hearings, without any committee action... they put it on the Suspension Calendar and simply got a non-recorded voice vote.

An important part of the legislative process is to introduce a bill in committee, to get both public and private observers to ask questions, make recommendations and offer comments on the bill.

But for some reason, HR 2640 was not given this benefit. The bill was rammed through the legislature with very few Representatives present on the House floor... there was no recorded vote at all!

[...]

Newspapers last month reported that Horatio Miller allegedly said that it could be "worse than Virginia Tech" if someone broke into his car, because there were guns there. It is not clear whether he was making a threat against a person who might burglarize his car, or if he was simply saying that the bad guy could do a lot of damage because of the guns he would find there. Nevertheless, Miller was arrested, but not charged with anything.

The comment Miller made was certainly not the smartest thing to say.
But realize, we don't incarcerate people for making stupid statements in this country -- at least not yet. Miller was a concealed carry permit holder who, as such, had passed vigorous background checks into his past history. Miller does not have a criminal record.

Regardless, the county district attorney did not like what he had said, so, according to the Harrisburg Patriot News on June 20, "I contacted the sheriff and had his license to carry a firearm revoked. And I asked police to commit him under Section 302 of the mental health procedures act and that was done. He is now ineligible to possess firearms [for life] because he was committed involuntarily."

Get that?

Pennsylvania is operating exactly the way Rep. McCarthy's bill (HR
2640) could treat all Americans. You might be thinking, I've never had a mental illness... I'm not a military veteran... I've never been on Ritalin... hey, I have nothing to worry about under the McCarthy bill. Right?

Well, think again.

[...]

The Pennsylvania case shows how all gun owners could be threatened by HR 2640. After all, did you ever tell anyone that the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights because the Founders (such as James Madison) wanted the people to be able to overturn a tyrannical American government?

Or, while you were watching the nightly news -- and getting a detailed account of all the crime in your area -- did you ever make a statement such as, "If someone were to break through my door, I'd blow him away!"

Well, those kinds of statements will certainly make anti-gun nuts think you're a potential danger to yourself or others. So if you make the local district attorney or police officer nervous, how difficult would it be for him to get a psychiatrist (most of whom are very left-wing) to say that you are a danger to yourself and to others?

Or, would the district attorney even need to get a psychiatrist? One of the outrageous aspects of the McCarthy bill is that Section 3(2) codifies existing federal regulations. And existing federal code says it only takes a "lawful authority" to "adjudicate" someone as a mental defective.(1) And another section of the bill makes it clear this "adjudication" does not need to be made by a formal court, but can simply be a "determination" -- such as a medical diagnosis.(2)

[...]

But who else could be classified as a "lawful authority"? A school counselor? A district attorney? What about a legislator, a city councilman or a cop? They are certainly "authorities" in their own right. Could the words "lawful authority" also apply to them?

[...]

In its open letter of May 9, 2007, BATFE makes it clear that this "danger" doesn't have to be "imminent" or "substantial," but can include "any danger" at all. How many shrinks -- using the Pennsylvania standard -- are going to say that a pro-gun American like you, who believes the Second Amendment is the last defense against tyranny, DOESN'T POSE AT LEAST AN INFINITESIMAL RISK of hurting someone else?

As easy as that, your gun rights would be gone forever.

HR 2640 is Janet Reno's dream. Does somebody make a politician nervous? Get a prescription pad, get your friendly left-wing psychiatrist to make the "dangerous" diagnosis, and it's all over. Expungement will be virtually impossible. Just turn in your guns.

[...]

CONTACT INFORMATION: You can use the pre-written letter below to help direct your comments to your two U.S. Senators. Please visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the pre-written e-mail message below.

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Senator:

The Military Order of the Purple Heart got it right when it stated that for the first time in history, HR 2640 "would statutorily impose a lifetime gun ban on battle-scarred veterans."

The Military Order of the Purple Heart, which is chartered by Congress, is urging the DEFEAT of HR 2640, the Brady-expansion legislation introduced by anti-gun Rep. Carolyn McCarthy.

Despite what you may have heard elsewhere, this bill THREATENS gun owners' rights and represents one of the biggest gun bans in history.


A recent case in Pennsylvania shows how easily a gun owner can be slapped with a LIFETIME gun ban, without any due process, based solely on a mere accusation by a shrink or other "lawful authority."
For more information on this -- and for a point-by-point analysis of HR 2640 -- please go to http://www.gunowners.org on the website of Gun Owners of America.

All the background checks in the world will NOT stop bad guys from getting firearms. Severe restrictions in Washington, DC, England, Canada, Germany and other places have not stopped evil people from using guns to commit murder.

Again, I hope you will OPPOSE the McCarthy bill (HR 2640). Thank you.

Sincerely,


****************************

Tragedy in SE Michigan

I can never understand why parents do these things. Unbelievable.

Police thought they were heading out to help an injured toddler.

But when they arrived, the boy was dead and they saw signs his parents were cooking methamphetamines inside the home.

That was the scene Monday afternoon in Sterling Heights, where police said they discovered the boy, about 18 months old, dead inside a home in the 42000 block of Betley.
Meth labs are extremely toxic. Whenever authorities discover one, they go in to dismantle it wearing protective gear that would impress workers at a chemical dump. It is a dangerous job for highly trained experts. And these people just cooked up meth in front of their kids. Unbelievable.

Monday, July 09, 2007

Backdoor Banning of Firearms

Much has been said across the blogosphere about the proposed OSHA changes to ammunition.

Here's a new, interesting piece of information (from packing.org):

Prominent anti-gun Senators Ted Kennedy, D-MA., Hillary Clinton, D-NY, and Barack Obama, D-IL., all are on the OSHA oversight committee.

Live Earth was DOA

Were you watching the LIVE EARTH concerts this weekend? No? Apparently lots of people had more important things to do Saturday. While exact figures are not yet available, it looks like somewhere around 100 million people saw at least portion of a concert on the web, TV, or live. Those aren't shabby viewing figures, but much less than the 2 billions viewers claimed by SOS, the sponsoring organization.

The LiveEarth website claims a lofty goal:

Live Earth marks the beginning of a multi-year campaign led by the Alliance for Climate Protection, The Climate Group and other international organizations to drive individuals, corporations and governments to take action to solve global warming. Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore is the Chair of the Alliance and Partner of Live Earth.
While it sounds like the actual goal is socialism, it seems clear that the success or failure of the concerts doesn't hinge on the number of viewers - it relies on what actions viewers will take now that they've been enlightened by music, socialist performers, and heavy use of the "f" word.
Live Earth has been branded a foul-mouthed flop.

Organisers of the global music concert - punctuated by swearing from presenters and performers - had predicted massive viewing figures.

But BBC's live afternoon television coverage attracted an average British audience of just 900,000.

In the evening, when coverage switched from BBC2 to BBC1, the figure rose to just 2.7 million.

And the peak audience, which came when Madonna sang at Wembley, was a dismal 4.5 million. Three times as many viewers saw the Princess Diana tribute on the same channel six days before.

Two years ago, Live 8 drew a peak television audience of 9.6million while Live Aid notched 10million in 1985.

The BBC blamed the poor figures on Saturday's good weather and said its Wimbledon tennis coverage had drawn away afternoon viewers.

Critics said however that the public had simply snubbed what they saw as a hypocritical event.

Musicians including Bob Geldof, Roger Daltrey and the Pet Shop Boys pointed out that a concert highlighting climate change had itself generated huge carbon emissions.

Performers were criticised for flying to concerts that were staged simultaneously on seven continents.

The BBC's coverage, which ran for 15 hours from 12.30pm on Saturday to 4am yesterday, also sparked dozens of complaints about bad language.

The swearing started at 1.30pm when Phil Collins, the first act on in London, used the f-word while singing with his band Genesis.

Razorlight singer Johnny Borrell used the same expletive a few minutes later in one of his songs. And Chris Rock swore while introducing fellow comic Ricky Gervais, who soon followed suit.

[...]

A BBC spokesman said: "We asked artists not to swear but sometimes they get carried away. We are very sorry for any offence caused."
And, as Patrick over at Born Again Redneck Yogi posted, the South Africa concert didn't draw a crowd:
Officials at LIVE EARTH Johannesburg have blamed the effects of climate change for poor audience attendance at Saturday's (07Jul07) South African event. Organiser John Langford believes extremely cold weather in the region - it snowed last week (ends06Jul07) for the first time in a quarter of a century - kept people away from the concert...
Of course, those evil capitalists had to get their hands into this green event, really ticking off Greenpeace - and rightly so. For a concert sponsored by a bunch of socialists, I can't imagine anything worse than a global corporation using this concert to make money off of their pseudo-green automobile. And to pour salt on the wound, Daimler now has, by virtue of association with this event, a big, green "get out of jail free" card when the green community protests automobiles, auto companies, and manufacturing in general.
Environmental pressure group Greenpeace is up in arms over the fact that auto giant DaimlerChrysler is the main sponsor for the Live Earth concert taking place in Germany on Saturday.

The concerts themselves are supposed to highlight the sorry state of the planet and the increasing damage that the human race is doing to the environment. But the Live Earth shows which will take place around the world this Saturday are under fire due to the German event being sponsored by a major automotive company.

Environmental pressure group Greenpeace is livid that the Live Earth concert in Hamburg will be broadcast to the world with the name of DaimlerChrysler splashed all over it. The fact that Daimler manufactures large, pollution-spewing automobiles, Greenpeace claims, means that a more inappropriate sponsor than the car giant would be hard to find.

Greenpeace are also angry that the company's Smart car is the official vehicle of the Live Earth artists and models are being used at the Hamburg gig to ferry stars such as Colombian singer Shakira around. The environmentalists claim that the car isn't even environmentally friendly as it can only carry two people.

Democrat Blogger wants to Kill Rush and Nugent

I can't get over how much hatred so-called peace-loving Democrats have.

A Democratic Party blogger says he wants to shoot Rush Limbaugh and is calling for volunteers to assassinate rock star Ted Nugent, who champions the Second Amendment.

[...]

"How we can remain 'civil' in the face of this is beyond my ken," wrote Williams. "I will only reiterate what I've said WHEN they manage to inevitably push their litany of hatespeak into actual bloodletting, and full-blown civil war (for there is no other place that this hatred of American against American can go), well ... I've got dibs on Rush, as soon as it's legal and lawful to shoot him. Whoever wants Ted Nugent is welcome to him, but I would prefer that you would call it now, so as to conserve on ammunition. We will need to manage it prudently. But when the day comes that they have finally set brother against brother, and sister against sister in the name of their pocketbooks, I won't approach exterminating them with anything approaching remorse. They've already told me what they think of me, of my friends and of my peers. Now, I'm returning the favor. Put that in your pipe and have the WSJ editorial staff show you how to smoke it, Nugent. Courage."
Ok, that's freaky, although I don't think Ted Nugent would have any problem defending himself from some loony attack.

Please Pay Attention to Me


Will Sheehan ever get tired of cheap publicity stunts? Imagine the pain of having to cheer Nancy Pelosi in a primary election.

Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a slain soldier whose attacks on President George W. Bush made her a darling of the antiwar movement, has a new target: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Sheehan, who announced in late May that she was leaving the peace movement, said she will run against Pelosi unless the congresswoman moves to oust Bush in the next two weeks.

“I think all politicians should be held accountable,” Sheehan said Sunday. “Democrats and Americans feel betrayed by the Democratic leadership. We hired them to bring an end to the war.”

Sheehan said she will run as an independent against the San Francisco Democrat in 2008 if Pelosi does not file articles of impeachment against Bush by July 23. That’s when Sheehan and her supporters are to arrive in Washington, D.C., after a 13-day caravan and walking tour starting from the group’s war protest site near Bush’s ranch in Crawford.

Although Sheehan has never held public office, she said she already has the name recognition and would not have to run against Pelosi in a primary.
I hate to see Nancy Pelosi happy, but she must find this entire charade amusing. What could be better publicity than kicking Sheehan's butt in a primary election?

David Slays Goliath

What a weekend - at least if you're a Tiger fan. I have to admit, it helps now that they are a respectable team. A few years ago, they challenged the record for most losses in a season. Last year, they went to the World Series. I don't know if they'll pull it off this year, but at least they took out the vaunted Boston Red Sox in a sweep this weekend.

Our future ace pitcher is Andrew Miller, who looks like he's 16 but is really 22, threw a great game on Friday as the Tigers beat the Red Sox 9-2.

I wandered off to the Saturday game with some friends to watch Big Poppy (David Ortiz) smack a 2 run homer off of Jeremy Bonderman early in the top of the first. Expecting doom, we dodged the bullet and survived the inning down only 2-0. By the fifth inning, Craig Monroe of all people stepped up to the challenge and drove in 2 RBI's to even the score. The Tigers finally used wisdom and intentionally walked Ortiz the rest of the evening (4 times). Finally, late into the night, Pudge Rodriguez slipped one past Coco Crisp, driving in Gary Sheffield to win the game.

Finally, in spite of committing 5 errors, the Tigers pulled off a 6-5 victory over Boston, in large part due to Curtis Granderson.



What a weekend.

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Quote of the Week, July 1-7

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

- Edmund Burke

Friday, July 06, 2007

20 Michigan State Forest Campgrounds to Close on Monday

The State of Michigan announced that 20 state forest campgrounds at least temporarily because of the tight budget. They are located in the northern Lower Peninsula and eastern Upper Peninsula, and will remain closed through September 30.
Check out the Michigan DNR website for more information.

Press Release

Along with many other gun bloggers, I've decided that August 28, 2007 is "Support Your Local Gunshop Day" in the United States.

In a related story, Jesse Jackson announced he will organize a national day of protest in 25 cities on Aug. 28, 2007, to rally support for legislation to restrict gun sales.

"Our marching does not kill people; people who buy guns from gun shops kill people," Rev. Jackson said.
Actually, statistics show it isn't people who buy guns from gun shops that kill people - it's people who don't buy their guns from gun shops (that means lawless thugs, Rev. You know, criminals). Which is why "restricting gun sales" won't work to lower violence.

Never Daydream on the Range

I include this not as a bash on police, but to remind ourselves to be ever vigilant against carelessness and daydreaming while on the range. Fortunately, no one died, but one officer, a 15-year veteran, was hurt:

Police are investigating how a veteran LAPD firearms instructor wounded another officer in the left hamstring at a training facility when he mistook a loaded handgun for a mock version of the weapon, it was reported Thursday.

The incident occurred about 4 p.m. Monday at the Edward M. Davis Training Facility in Granada Hills as the two instructors, who train new recruits, were transitioning from teaching a class with live firearms to an exercise using mock handguns that look and sound like real weapons but do not discharge bullets, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Parts of the non-firing weapons are marked with orange paint, but the instructor failed to notice he had picked up the wrong handgun, police said, according to The Times.

The bullet struck Officer Peter Lee, 42, a 15-year veteran.

[...]

"When an officer picks up the (non-firing) weapons they are supposed to secure their live firearms. But one officer here didn't secure his live firearm and confused it. When he went to test the (mock) weapon he instead fired his real Glock and hit his fellow instructor."

Murphy said the injured officer is expected to return to duty.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Gun Control Ain't Crime Control

This is a few months old, but an excellent reminder from a TRUE reporter (a man who actually investigates before he appears in front of the camera) that gun control has nothing to do with crime control.

Good job, John Stossel.

Foreign Exchange Students

I was over at a friend's house yesterday, celebrating Independence Day. He and his family are hosting a foreign exchanged student from Spain.

I speak Spanish un poco, and she doesn't hable English very well (we speak it too fast over here, she said... that's something I can relate to because I had comprehension trouble while taking Spanish in college - native speakers in genuine conversations, as opposed to the slowed down teaching tapes, spoke way too fast to understand). But we worked together and after a while we could understand each other well, even though she complained I spoke Spanish with a French accent (I grew up with French as my second language - sorry if that let's anyone down).

When it came time for dinner, I couldn't wait to dig in. We had the typical American spread including the all-American dish, corn on the cob. We all started eating and she looked confused and a little bit grossed out. I asked her what was wrong and she leaned over and whispered to me "why are you eating pig's food?"

"What do you mean?" I asked, not sure what cultural norm we were violating.

"Only the pigs eat corn like that. People cut the corn off and it eat off of their plate."

"Are you calling me a pig?" I asked jokingly.

"No, you just eat like one" she said back seriously, not recognizing the humor in my question (I assume).

I get a real kick out of differences between cultures and countries. This American's ultimate summer treat is that European's pig slop. That's part of the joy of traveling and learning.

"You know what's really disgusting?" I asked her. "In France they eat snails."

"What are 'snails'?"

"The call it escargot."

"Yes, it is wonderful," she told me.

Snails? Edible? For human beings? And the Europeans think we are disgusting? I guess one European's ultimate treat is this American's fish tank cleaner. That's part of the joy of traveling and learning.

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Words to Remember This Independence Day

It was only 1,337 words long - not even 4 full pages of text by our modern standards. Yet, those few simple, clear words were worth fighting and dying for. If the revolution failed the brave men who signed the document were signing their execution papers.

Even if the Revolution succeeded, they were risking everything - their lives, their security, their families, their honor, their wealth, their land, their homes.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
What were those causes "which impel them to the separation"?

In short, Liberty.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Government had a holy and honorable mandate:
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
and when the government abused power or failed to secure these rights from the people, the people had a responsibility to intervene:
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
These men were not rebels for the sake of stirring up trouble. Most were loyal British subjects, until the British government under King George III and a hostile Parliament failed and abused them one to many times.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.

To prove it's case to the world and to posterity, these are the charges laid against the King. First and foremost, he is a tyrant.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
Next, he disregards all legal leadership among the colonists.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has kept the legal population down and inhibited citizenship.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has corrupted the judicial system and placed his cronies in charge to routinely keep citizens from enjoying their rights.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He abuses British colonial citizens by using the British armed forces against them
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has conspired to make up the law as he sees fit.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

Homes are illegally seized for military occupation and headquartering (necessitating the 3rd Amendment after the Bill of Rights was drawn up years later):
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

He has denied the citizens a way to earn a living and punished them without due process of law.
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

And in general, the King has declared a de facto war against the colonial citizenry through his actions.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

Because of these abuses, and the refusal to right the wrongs - even the refusal to listen to the complaints of the wronged - the colonies must divorce themselves and exist as their own legal entity.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


This document is our country's birth certificate, born on the 4th of July, 1776. Yet, if we take a look at the reasons for the establishment of this land, we see that current government looks much like the British tyranny the Founding Fathers' fought against. From actions against the citizens, there is not much difference between the government of King George III and the government of George W. Bush.

This 4th of July, let's resolve to re-read the words of the Declaration - it only takes a few minutes, but those few minutes will remind us that government is supposed to serve the people, not the other way around.

Ouch



I know this has been on a few gun blogs lately, but in case you missed it, why not spend the next few seconds remembering that bullets are dangerous.

That's a .50 cal he's firing, by the way.

Proposed OSHA Regulation Threatens

I wonder where the NRA, so-called guardian of our 2nd amendment freedoms, is when news like this comes out...

From the NSSF:
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the government agency charged with assuring the safety and health of America's workers, is proposing a regulatory rule affecting the manufacturing, transportation and storage of small arms ammunition, primers and smokeless propellants.

As written, the proposed rule would force the closure of nearly all ammunition manufacturers and force the cost of small arms ammunition to skyrocket beyond what the market could bear—essentially collapsing our industry. This is not an exaggeration. The cost to comply with the proposed rule for the ammunition industry, including manufacturer, wholesale distributors and retailers, will be massive and easily exceed $100 million. For example, ammunition and smokeless propellant manufacturers would have to shut down and evacuate a factory when a thunderstorm approached and customers would not be allowed within 50 feet of any ammunition (displayed or otherwise stored) without first being searched for matches or lighters.

Good News from our Northern Neighbors

Good news out of Ottawa, Canada:

A federally commissioned poll of "stakeholders" selected by the government to comment on potential changes to gun control found more opposition than support for tighter restrictions.

In the wake of the Dawson College shooting rampage in Montreal last September that left one dead and 19 wounded, the Conservative government said it would still move to kill the long-gun registry, but promised to toughen screening of gun owners.

It has yet to actually pass its bill to eliminate the registry, or bring in other regulations that would achieve the "more streamlined and effective" gun control system it promised.

When tougher screening measures were presented to participants in the survey, they were more often poorly received, while changes that appeared to lessen the burden on gun owners, such as dropping a five-year licence renewal requirement, were supported by a majority of participants.

[...]

Overall, it found 50 per cent opposed to a requirement for "a more robust set of background references," saying the current system is already sufficient. About 38 per cent supported more references. About 10 per cent were "neutral," the survey said.

There were similar responses to the other tougher licence screening measures.
So, Canadian citizens don't want more government interference. The Canadian government commissioned a research company, Ekos, to do the study. What do they recommend?
And Ekos [the research company conducting this survey for the government] also warned the results "should be interpreted with caution."
If you can't stand behind your work, why charge the government for this study?

Who is Getting the Oklahoma CCW Licenses?

Addendum to the previous post:

In 2006, the state approved nearly twice as many concealed-handgun licenses for people in Tulsa County as in Oklahoma County, according to the Self Defense Act Statistical Report, issued by the OSBI.

Among the increasing number of Oklahomans who are are obtaining licenses are more elderly people and women than in previous years.

"There’s been a great increase in elderly folks and ladies,” said Robert Welch, a concealed-handgun license instructor in Tulsa. “Before, it was about 90 percent middle-aged males. Now it’s at least 50 percent female and senior citizens."

Armed and Licensed: Concealed carry law hitting mark

From the Sooner State:

If the number of concealed-handgun license holders is any indication, robbers may have to worry about getting more than stolen goods during a heist.

With an increasing number of state residents legally packing heat, more robbers may be taking away some hot lead.

More than 54,000 Oklahomans are licensed to carry concealed handguns under the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act, said Jessica Brown, spokeswoman for the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation. That number is up from around 31,000 in 2000 and 15,081 in 1996, after the first year of licensing. Once approved, applicants are licensed to carry concealed weapons for five years. After five years, they are required to renew their application.

In the beginning, some people thought a wave of shootings by license holders would occur, but those fears have proved to be unfounded, Brown said.

"There's very little of that, quite frankly," she said. "Most people don't want to hurt each other."

Former state Sen. Frank Shurden, who sponsored the bill that led to the law, said he had tried to get the bill through the Legislature for several years but that fears of more shootings and of a more dangerous work environment for law enforcement officers held it back.

"They didn't have confidence in law-abiding citizens like I did, but they do now," said Shurden, a Democrat from Henryetta. "They claimed that every fender bender would be a shootout."

Shurden said he is pleased with the law's results more than 10 years after it went into effect.

"They (license holders) have to be good, upstanding people. That's one reason it worked so well," he said.

"I've always been of the opinion that when good, law-abiding citizens are armed, we're all safer. I'm real satisfied with the way the law is working."

Robert Welch, a Tulsa concealed-weapon license instructor, and Tulsa Police Officer Jason Willingham both noted that there have been instances in which a license holder has foiled a robbery or other crime.

Last November, a man who Tulsa police say had just committed a burglary, stolen a car and fled from police crashed the car and then accosted a bystander with a knife. The victim, a concealed-handgun license holder, pulled his weapon on the man, prompting him to flee.

In March 2006, a customer with a concealed-handgun license shot an armed man who was attempting to rob a supermarket near 91st Street and Memorial Drive.

This year in the Tulsa area, there have been three shootings -- one fatal -- by people who have concealed-carry licenses. Police say the two shootings in Tulsa were sparked by traffic altercations that became physical and ended with the license holders shooting people they said had physically assaulted them.

In the first shooting, which occurred at 18th Street and Boston Avenue in April, police say a motorist who had to stop for a pedestrian shot the pedestrian's friend during a resulting altercation. The man who was shot was treated at a hospital and released. The motorist was charged with recklessly handling a firearm and has pleaded not guilty.

On June 10, police say a retired security guard fatally shot a man during a road-rage-sparked confrontation in a parking lot in the 1900 block of Riverside Drive. The retired guard told police that he feared for his life when the other man verbally and physically assaulted him. He has not been charged with any crime.

In Muskogee last weekend, police said a pastor who holds a concealed-weapon license shot a man who, along with some juveniles, tried to rob his church's fireworks tent. The minister said he feared for his life and that of the teenager who was watching the tent with him.

The shooting victim was arrested in connection with the burglary attempt after he was released from the hospital, police said.

Willingham said that, in their duties, most police officers rarely come across concealed-handgun license holders.

"Most people who go through the trouble of getting a concealed-carry permit are not committing crimes," he said. "By and large, the people with concealed-carry permits are not the ones we're coming in contact with."

Welch agreed.

"Most goofballs and hot heads don't think to go and get a permit," he said. "Mostly, it's people who are law-abiding in nature."

Brown and Welch said increased exposure to terrorism, war and violent crime through the media may play a role in why more people are arming themselves.

During classes applicants must take before they can obtain a license, they must show that they know how to shoot and properly handle a firearm.

They also are instructed on how to tell a police officer -- should they come into contact with one -- that they have a concealed weapon.

"Do we worry? No," Willingham said. "We know people with concealed-carry permits are not the type of people out there committing crimes. Your gang-bangers, armed robbers -- they're not the ones going through the class and paying the fee."

This is why I live in Detroit instead of NYC




Unbelievable.

Reverend Billy says he wants the New York Police Department to get right with the Constitution.

The performance artist — a cross between a street-corner preacher and an Elvis impersonator (but blond) — was arrested on harassment charges last week while reciting the First Amendment through a megaphone in Manhattan's Union Square. On Monday, he donned his trademark white suit and returned to the scene of his alleged sin to demand that police repent.


Image © Associated Press






"It feels so good to be back on the very spot where I was denied my First Amendment rights by reciting the First Amendment," he told reporters over the din of an NYPD helicopter hovering overhead.

Reverend Billy, whose real name is Bill Talen, was joined by women in red choir robes who sang a hymn version of the amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech. Other activists distributed an amateur videotape of his arrest.

Eyes closed and hands raised, the pretend pastor whooped, "Bill of Rights-elujah!"

Talen, 57, has spent years using his mock persona as a fire-and-brimstone evangelist to rail against consumer culture — what he portrays as the Disneyfication of Manhattan. He was arrested this year on misdemeanor trespassing charges for protesting at a Starbucks; that case is pending.

His latest run-in with the law began after he turned up to support people gathering in Union Square last Friday for the monthly Critical Mass bike ride asserting cyclists' rights.

The NYPD has aggressively policed the rides, arguing that they can interfere with traffic and threaten public safety. Advocates for Critical Mass have accused police of infringing on the riders' constitutional rights to free speech and free assembly.

The video shows Talen preaching the "44 beautiful words of the First Amendment" to a visibly annoyed congregation of police commanders huddled a few feet away. At one point, an officer approaches and warns him that his sermon is breaking the law.

"What's the law?" Talen asks.

"Harassment," the officer answers.

When Talen persists, another officer comes up behind him and slaps on handcuffs. When being put in a police van, the satirist shouts, "We have a right to peaceful assembly!"

Talen was held overnight before being released without bail. A criminal complaint alleges he harassed police officers by approaching them and "repeatedly shouting at such officers through a non-electric bullhorn."

Civil rights attorney Norman Siegel, appearing with Talen on Monday, called on prosecutors to drop the charges.

"The arrest was a false arrest," Siegel said. "What Reverend Billy did last Friday night does not constitute illegal conduct."

Prosecutors declined to comment. The New York Police Department, contacted Monday evening, said it had no comment.

Blogs for Borders Blogburst, July 3

Monday, July 02, 2007

Pro-Lifers Make Impact at NEA Teacher Convention

Out of Philidelphia:

Seventy-five pro-life teachers, parents/taxpayers and children/students successfully picketed the NEA convention in Philadelphia on Sunday, July 1. Aged eight to eighty, they took positions on all four corners of Arch & 11th Streets, displaying high-visibility signs and posters easily seen by thousands of NEA Delegates disembarking from shuttle buses or entering and leaving the Convention Center's doorways.

Pro-lifers and delegates were interviewed by reporters and photojournalists from FOX, Philadelphia Bulletin, Washington Times, Catholic Standard & Times, etc.

Many delegates openly expressed disbelief, skepticism, and even shock, at the revelation that NEA was involved in abortion at all – much less in an advocacy role – much less pro-abortion. They were totally unaware of NEA's long-standing "Family Planning Resolution" supporting "reproductive freedom" and "all methods of family planning" – including abortion. Some refused to accept the well-documented fact that NEA is one of Planned Parenthood's primary advocates and actually co-sponsored huge pro-abortion rallies in Washington in April 2004, April 1992, and November 1989.

A few belligerent delegates verbally berated the pro-lifers, accusing them of "lying". Others thanked pro-lifers for bringing NEA's abortion activism into sharp focus. Some said they would raise the issue on the Convention Floor and attempt to have NEA totally abandon its pro-abortion agenda and activism.

Bob Pawson, National Coordinator of PLEAS and NJEA member, said, "We joined NEA for collective bargaining representation; not to be misrepresented on socio-political or moral issues like abortion, homosexuality, or who to vote for. Respect the diversity of 3.2 million members. Totally disengage NEA from the abortion issue. Become truly neutral and completely non-involved."

"The NEA leadership's pro-abortion agenda is a perverse way of supposedly protecting our jobs. Babies are our business; our only business. For NEA to condone, much less promote, killing babies in their wombs is not only a moral outrage; it's economic suicide. Abortion costs us our jobs."

NEA wants us unified for contract negotiations every few years, yet simultaneously divides us with radical, far left, extremist positions on issues like abortion. News flash: We don't feel unified. We feel betrayed. We resent having our dues monies used to subvert our personal moral values, and then being offered "thirty pieces of silver."

Mow Your Lawn or Do The Time

In the past, I've had neighbors that didn't take care of their yards. While I'd want my local government to enforce code, I'd never want neighbors to go to jail over something like an unkempt yard. Of course, I realized that no government would ever throw someone in the clink for keeping a yucky yard. This is the land of the free, right?

Wrong.

From the west side of Michigan:

A Newaygo County man could spend another weekend behind bars if he doesn't take care of his yard.

David Burch says he tried to seed the yard last fall but it wouldn't take root. This all stems from a contractor who failed to sod the yard in the first place. Now a judge is saying, do the yard or do the time.

"The people who work at the court, at the jail, thought it was funny," Burch said. "They said there had to be more. I said, 'No, it's just because I don't have grass growing.' They said, 'You're in here for that?'"

He claims he is not skirting the law. Burch said the contractor for his new house is responsible for the lawn. But a White Cloud city ordinance states otherwise.

"This has been in the courts for over a year," said White Cloud Police Chief Roger Ungrey. "I believe Mr. Burch has made an attempt. He did bring me in some receipts for grass seed."

But when it didn't grow, a county judge ordered the yard planted. It never happened. Again this April - no sprouts. Then, in jail, an inspiration. Burch is sodding his yard with donated turf.

"He has been working on it," Ungrey said. "However, he remains to this day noncompliant."

That is because the backyard must also be green.

But will the patchwork sod qualify as a lawn? "It's not your normal sod that you would have, that you would go to a sod farm and purchase," Ungrey told 24 Hour News 8. "So that remains to be seen. I can't answer that question."

Burch was back in court Thursday. The judge told him he has two weeks to complete the job. If not, it's another weekend back in jail.
And from Georgia:
A Gwinnett County woman's grass is high; there are cars in her front yard, and now the 21-year-old pregnant woman has gone to jail because of it.

It's part of a new clean-up initiative in Gwinnett County -- but Nicole Schandera's family has said that the clean-up has gone too far.

The broken down car in the front yard gives it away. Officers cited the owner of the house south of Snellville for high grass and weeds, improper outdoor signage, excess trash, and tree debris, among other things.

Family members admit there are some problems.

"I mean there's a little bit of stuff that needs to be done -- the grass needs to be cut, we need to get a car out of the yard, but half of the stuff on there is absolutely false," said Lewis Schandera, the woman's father.

Thirteen violations in all, and some that Lewis does not agree with.

"They wrote this car up as a junk car," he said about one car. "It's got tags and insurance, it's drivable -- my ex-wife's brother drives it everyday. There's not a single broken window on the house."

Lewis is taking pictures to try and prove his case to authorities, but what really shocks him is what happened to his daughter because of this.

"Seven months pregnant and they carried her to jail for code violations," Lewis said. "Seven months pregnant, (they) handcuffed her, hands behind her back put her in a patrol car with no A/C and the window down, and it was 90 degrees at 2:00 in the afternoon."

It took Nicole almost 12 hours to bond out of jail after her arrest. Now, family members say they are working on cleaning up the problems.

The family said they plan to get the car out of the yard this weekend, and they're going to mow the grass and cleanup. But the trip to jail is still hard for them to understand.

"We're tryin' to make progress, but I really don't see all that much," Lewis said. "There's some work, absolutely, but not enough to take my daughter to jail seven months pregnant."

It is an effort to clean up that Lewis said he feels has gone too far.

"Shocked," he said. "I could not believe it. I still can't believe it."

Gwinnet County police said a trip to jail is not a typical result. They said they always issue a written notice of violation first, then try to work with the homeowner to get things cleaned up.

England... Land of the Anti-Self-Defense Clowns

This lovely news out of England - but several Republicans and Democrats want to import it here as soon as possible.

First the story, then some analysis.

A shopkeeper has been fined £250 and given a criminal record because he fought back when he was attacked by shoplifters.

Jacob Smyth chased three youths out of his hardware shop in Penzance, Cornwall, when he was set upon. When he was kicked in the groin by one of the hooded youths who had stolen cans of spray paint Mr Smyth hit back.

Police issued fixed penalty tickets to the shoplifters but charged Mr Smyth and a colleague with assault.

Yesterday he pleaded guilty to assault at Truro Magistrates’ Court. He claimed after the hearing that he had been advised to plead guilty because otherwise he could have faced a six month prison sentence.

The court was told that Mr Smyth, a father of three, caught the youths stealing the spray cans in October last year. Two of them turned on him and he was kicked in his groin just weeks after a vasectomy operation. He retaliated and punched 18-year-old Craig Spiller to the ground.

Paul Gallagher, defending, said: “The court can only imagine what they intended to do with that spray paint. He could see the cans poking out of their pockets. He leant forward to get them and at that stage he was set upon.

“He did punch one of them to get him off. In the heat of the moment he kicked him once or twice. Initially he was acting in self defence. Frustration at the situation took over. The lads were interviewed and given fixed penalty notices by police but unfortunately for Mr Smyth ended up in court today.

“He was the one who was trying to do the right thing and get his stolen property back.”

Julian Herbert, prosecuting, said the “aggravating factor” of the case was shop staff “taking the law into their own hands”. Fining Mr Smyth £250 and ordering him to pay £43 costs, Angy Haslam, chairman of the magistrates, said: “The act was aggravated by the fact you kicked the victim on the ground. We feel it has been mitigated because you acted in self defence.”

Speaking outside court, Mr Smyth said: “I did nothing wrong. I was getting a good beating from this lad. I had no choice but to defend myself.

“We get shoplifters all the time one after the other. We call the police but nothing is ever done. We called them on this occasion and ran after the lads to try and get my property back but then they turned on us. “Am I not allowed to protect my stock and premises from thieves?”

Mr Smyth’s colleague Jason Pascoe, 34, has also been charged with two counts of common assault and will appear in court at a later date.
I don't really know what to say, other than what is it about governments that want a bunch of passive, crime-accepting citizens? Shame on those in the British anti-self-defense movement.

Second, the comments online (as of writing this post) are quite favorable (or should I write "favourable" since we are talking about Britain) to the shopkeeper and against the foolish government actions. The British take a lot of heat from the American pro-gun and pro-self-defense community. Stuff like this shows how much the citizenry realizes they have a right to self-defense, a right their government is denying them. Their leadership has betrayed them, sold them a "feel good" bill of goods that sounds good, but doesn't work. Sound familiar here in the USA?

Third, this kind of thinking is all over the USA as well. The Castle Doctrine laws, in part, are a response to this kind of anti-self-defense blatherskite. How ironic and tragic that the idea - a man's home is his castle - comes out of the English system.

US Navy Sailor Killed in Michigan

It sickens me to see thugs out on parole.

Two men have been arrested in the slaying of [a] 22-year-old Bernard Cranford, whose cash and sunglasses were the motive in his shooting, police said.

[...]

Witnesses told Wayne County Sheriff's deputies that [Thug #1] pulled out a gun and told Cranford to empty his pockets and hand over what [Thug #1] thought were designer sunglasses.

Police said [Thug #1] fired several shots, two of which struck Cranford, killing him. Cranford was on leave from the U.S. Navy at the time.

Thug #1, parole for a 2001 armed robbery conviction, was questioned and arrested after Wayne County Deputies received a tip he was one of the gunmen.
Thugs #1 and #2 were charged with first-degree murder, two counts of assault with intent to rob while armed, using a firearm to commit a felony, being felons in possession of a firearm and being habitual offenders.

Sunday, July 01, 2007

False Hope

The Michigan minimum wage rises to $7.15 an hour starting today.

“This increase will put a little more money in the pockets of Michigan citizens who are working hard every day to pay for rent, to fill up their gas tanks, and to put food on the table for their kids,” [Governor] Granholm said.

Granholm said increasing the minimum wage is one part of her plan to diversify and grow Michigan’s economy. The state’s reliance on automotive and manufacturing jobs has contributed to its economic problems.
Not to sound defeatist, but making $7.15 an hour (up from $6.95 an hour) isn't going to put a "little more money" in the pockets of Michigan citizens. Let's see, $0.20 an hour, assuming (but probably not) working at 40 hours a week, gives an extra $8 a week. Pre-tax, that is enough for 2.3 gallons of gasoline, or about two boxes of cereal.

And I don't know how paying $7.15 an hour is supposed to "diversify and grow Michigan’s economy."